Breach of Contract in New York: What You Can Recover & When to Sue | BFC 

By James Clark,

Breach of Contract in New York: What You Can Recover & When to Sue | BFC 

If the other side breached a contract, delay can cost you leverage. Learn what damages you can recover under NY law and when litigation makes sense.  

Steven M. Fink, Esq. 

The Other Side Breached the Contract; Every Day You Wait Costs You Leverage. 

When a contract is breached, most businesses focus on the breach itself. That is a mistake. The real damage usually happens after the breach, while emails go unanswered, promises are made without follow-through, and weeks pass with no resolution. During that time, leverage erodes, defenses take shape, and recovery becomes harder. 

Under New York law, a breach creates rights. But those rights are not self-executing, and they are not permanent. How you respond in the first phase of a breach often determines whether you recover at all. 

If the other side has stopped paying, stopped performing, or walked away from a signed agreement, the question is no longer whether there was a breach. The question is whether you are already behind. 

A Strong Case Can Be Weakened by Inaction 

Many breach of contract cases fail for reasons that have nothing to do with the contract itself. They fail because the non-breaching party waited, accepted partial performance, continued performing without reservation, or assumed informal resolution would work. Those decisions are often used against them later. 

New York courts look closely at conduct after a breach. Silence, delay, and inconsistent action can be framed as waiver, acceptance, or acquiescence. By the time litigation begins, the strongest arguments may already be compromised. 

What Is Actually Recoverable Depends on What You Do Next 

Contract damages are intended to put you in the position you would have been in had the contract been performed. In practice, recovery is driven by two things: (1) the language of the agreement and (2) the steps taken after the breach. 

Unpaid amounts are only the starting point. Lost profits, interest, and attorneys’ fees may be recoverable, but only if they are supported by the contract and preserved through proper action. Businesses frequently assume these remedies exist, only to learn later that they were waived, limited, or undermined by delay. 

Waiting for “One More Chance” Often Backfires 

A common pattern in breach cases is repeated extensions without consequence. Each extension signals that the breach is tolerable. Each delay gives the breaching party time to reposition financially, move assets, or prepare defenses. 

In some cases, waiting allows a counterparty to shut down entirely, leaving a paper judgment with no recovery behind it. At that point, the legal issue is no longer breach of contract. It is damage control. 

Litigation Is Often the Leverage, Not the Last Resort 

Businesses often hesitate to litigate because they assume it will be slow, expensive, or disruptive. In reality, early litigation frequently accelerates resolution. 

When a breach is clear and damages are real, litigation applies pressure, forces accountability, and prevents further loss. Many cases resolve quickly once the breaching party realizes delay no longer benefits them. Handled correctly, litigation is not escalation. It is containment. 

Why “Clear” Contract Cases Still Get Lost 

Even strong contracts contain provisions that can derail enforcement if they are ignored. Notice requirements, cure periods, limitation clauses, and fee provisions are not technicalities. They are leverage points. 

Failing to address them early can turn a clean breach into a prolonged dispute, or worse, a dismissed claim. 

How We Handle Breach of Contract Litigation 

At Blodnick, Fazio & Clark, we treat breach of contract matters as business problems, not academic exercises. Our focus is on speed, leverage, and recoverability. 

We represent businesses, landlords, lenders, and investors when contracts are broken and delay is no longer an option. The goal is not motion practice for its own sake. The goal is to put pressure where it matters and resolve the dispute on favorable terms. 

If a Contract Has Been Breached, the Clock Is Already Running 

Every day that passes after a breach affects leverage, options, and recovery. Waiting rarely improves the situation. More often, it limits it. 

A short, focused review can determine whether litigation strengthens your position, what damages are realistically recoverable, and what immediate steps should be taken to protect your interests. 

A Contract Was Breached. Delay Only Helps the Other Side. 

If the other party has stopped paying or stopped performing, waiting can weaken your position. A short review can determine whether litigation strengthens your leverage and what recovery realistically looks like.  Contact Blodnick, Fazio & Clark now before delay limits your options. 

Steven M. Fink, Esq. is a partner at Blodnick Fazio & Clark. To learn more about navigating a potential breach of contract, contact Mr. Fink at sfink@bfclaws.com or 631-669-6300.  

  Filed under: Uncategorized
  Comments: Comments Off on Breach of Contract in New York: What You Can Recover & When to Sue | BFC 


Good Cause Eviction (GCE) in New York

By James Clark,

Good Cause Eviction (GCE) is a legal framework in New York that protects tenants from arbitrary evictions by requiring landlords to provide a valid reason, or “good cause,” for terminating a tenancy or refusing to renew a lease. Enacted as part of broader tenant protection reforms, GCE aims to stabilize housing for renters, particularly in high-cost areas, by limiting landlords’ ability to evict tenants without justification. Below is a clear explanation of GCE, tailored to the context of New York, including Nassau and Suffolk County, as of 2025. 

What is Good Cause Eviction? 

GCE laws mandate that landlords can only evict tenants or decline to renew a lease for specific reasons outlined in the law. These reasons typically include: 

· Non-payment of rent: The tenant fails to pay rent owed, provided the rent increase is deemed reasonable (see below). 

· Lease violations: The tenant breaches lease terms, such as causing property damage, engaging in illegal activities, or creating a nuisance. 

· Substantial lease violations: Repeated or severe breaches, like unauthorized subletting or refusing landlord access for necessary repairs. 

· Landlord’s personal use: The landlord seeks to recover the unit for their own use or for a family member, though this is subject to strict conditions. 

· Property sale or demolition: The landlord intends to sell the property or convert it for non-residential use, with proper notice and documentation. 

Without one of these valid reasons, a landlord cannot evict a tenant or force them to vacate, even if the lease term has expired. 

Key Features of GCE 

· Rent Increase Protections: 

· GCE includes a rebuttable presumption that rent increases exceeding 5% plus the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 10% of the current rent (whichever is less) are “unreasonable.” 

· If a tenant challenges an eviction based on non-payment of an excessive rent increase, the landlord must prove in court that the increase is reasonable, considering factors like market rates, property improvements, or operating costs. 

· Applicability: 

· As of 2025, GCE is fully implemented in New York City for most market-rate apartments in buildings with six or more units, following the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) and subsequent legislation. 

· In Nassau and Suffolk County, GCE may apply if local municipalities opt in, as the law allows cities, towns, or villages to adopt GCE for their jurisdictions. Tenants in rent-stabilized units or buildings with fewer than six units may have different protections. 

· Exemptions: 

· GCE typically does not apply to owner-occupied buildings with fewer than six units, condos, co-ops, or units where the rent exceeds 245% of the fair market rent (as defined by HUD). 

· Newer buildings (constructed after a certain date, often 2009) may also be exempt, depending on local regulations. 

Process and Tenant Rights 

· Notice Requirements: Landlords must provide written notice specifying the good cause for eviction, typically 30 to 90 days, depending on the tenancy length or reason. 

· Court Oversight: Evictions under GCE must go through housing court, where tenants can contest the landlord’s claims. Tenants may request adjournments or legal representation, often available through legal aid organizations like Nassau/Suffolk Law Services in Suffolk County. 

· Retaliation Protections: Landlords cannot evict tenants in retaliation for exercising their rights, such as reporting code violations or organizing with other tenants. 

Impact in Suffolk County 

In Suffolk County, GCE’s adoption depends on local government action, as towns like Huntington or Islip can choose to implement it. Where applicable, GCE strengthens tenant protections by preventing evictions driven by speculative rent hikes or landlord whims. However, landlords retain the right to evict for legitimate reasons, provided they follow due process. Tenants benefit from increased stability, while landlords must ensure compliance with notice and documentation requirements to avoid legal challenges. 

For more information, or if you or someone you know needs assistance navigating the changes to the Good Cause Eviction laws in New York, please contact landlord-tenant attorney Jim Clark (T: 631-669-6300, E: jclark@bfclaws.com).

  Filed under: Uncategorized
  Comments: Comments Off on Good Cause Eviction (GCE) in New York


Current Trends In Landlord-Tenant Law in Suffolk County, NY (2025)

By James Clark,

Landlord-tenant law in Suffolk County, New York, continues to evolve, reflecting broader state-level reforms and local ordinances aimed at balancing the rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants. As of 2025, several key trends are shaping the legal landscape, driven by legislative changes, tenant protections, and judicial practices. These trends impact rental agreements, eviction processes, and anti-discrimination measures, creating a dynamic environment for property owners and renters alike. 

One significant trend is the continued influence of New York’s Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) of 2019, which has reshaped landlord-tenant dynamics across the state, including Suffolk County. The HSTPA imposes strict limits on rent increases for rent-stabilized units, caps fees, and enhances tenant protections against arbitrary evictions. In Suffolk County, where rent stabilization applies in certain communities, landlords must adhere to guidelines set by the state’s Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR). For instance, landlords can only claim up to three Individual Apartment Improvements (IAIs) within a 15-year period, with costs capped at $15,000, and these increases are temporary, expiring after 30 years. This ensures tenants are not burdened with excessive rent hikes tied to renovations. 

Another notable development is the implementation of Good Cause Eviction (GCE) laws, effective in New York City and potentially applicable to other municipalities like Suffolk County by 2025. GCE prevents landlords from evicting tenants without a specified “good cause,” such as non-payment of rent or lease violations. A rebuttable presumption exists that rent increases exceeding 5% plus the Consumer Price Index (or 10% of the existing rent, whichever is less) are unreasonable, requiring landlords to justify higher increases in court. While primarily enforced in NYC, Suffolk County landlords should monitor local adoption, as it could limit their ability to terminate leases without cause, especially for market-rate apartments. 

Anti-discrimination protections remain a critical focus in Suffolk County. Landlords with buildings containing three or more units cannot refuse to rent based on a tenant’s lawful source of income, such as Section 8 vouchers or public assistance. Additionally, federal and state laws prohibit discrimination based on race, gender, disability, or other protected characteristics. Suffolk County’s Human Rights Commission provides a local avenue for tenants to file grievances if they suspect discriminatory practices, reinforcing fair housing standards. 

The eviction process in Suffolk County is also under scrutiny, with courts emphasizing procedural compliance. Evictions for non-payment of rent require a 14-day Notice to Pay, while holdover proceedings (e.g., lease expiration) mandate 30 to 90 days’ notice, depending on tenancy length. Courts in Suffolk County are known to favor landlords in disputes, but tenants can delay proceedings by requesting adjournments or legal representation, often provided pro bono by organizations like Nassau/Suffolk Law Services. Illegal lockouts or utility shutoffs are strictly prohibited, and tenants can sue for triple damages in such cases. 

Finally, lease requirements in Suffolk County mandate that landlords offer written leases of at least one year for buildings with three or more units, enhancing tenant security. This trend underscores the county’s commitment to formalizing rental agreements to prevent disputes. 

In conclusion, Suffolk County’s landlord-tenant laws in 2025 reflect a tenant-friendly framework, with robust protections against unfair rent increases, discriminatory practices, and unjust evictions. Landlords must navigate these regulations carefully, while tenants benefit from increased legal recourse and support. Staying informed through resources like the Suffolk County Bar Association or local housing services is essential for both parties to thrive in this evolving legal landscape. 

For more information, or if you or someone you know needs assistance with a landlord-tenant matter in Suffolk County, New York, please contact landlord-tenant attorney Jim Clark.   

  Filed under: Uncategorized
  Comments: Comments Off on Current Trends In Landlord-Tenant Law in Suffolk County, NY (2025)


Beware the Ides of March

By James Clark,

proofreading document

Beware the ides of March. These famous words mark the day that Julius Caesar was tragically assassinated to death by his senate. Caesar’s stabbing followed a period of unrest in ancient Rome, and eventually led to Rome’s transformation from a republic to an empire. However, the ominous origins of this phrase are rooted in literature. In Shakespeare’s culturally transcendent Julius Caesar, the prophetic soothsayer warns Caesar about this day by cautioning him to “Beware the ides of March.”

Shakespeare’s words apply to the real estate world, too. At a certain point, investors, home flippers and landlords need to pause, assess, and exercise caution– and to back away from any dangerous edges.

Remaining Cautious as a Real Estate Investor

As an attorney for landlords and active real estate investors, I’m constantly warning my clients to beware. In the real estate world, there are many potential pitfalls that even highly capable and experienced professionals can fall into. I’ve seen many theoretically sound deals fall and crumble from complacency. More importantly, I’ve noticed how these problems could have been avoided.

Taking a step back from from time-to-time to evaluate potential risks is critical.

Avoiding In-Court Disputes

The best way to resolve issues in the real estate world is avoiding them altogether.

Having participated in my fair share of litigated real estate cases, I understand the time and energy that all parties expend when an argument arises. While I’m proud to fight to the last for my clients when trouble arises, I take no pleasure in the long, drawn-out disputes that take a financial and emotional toll on my clients. Instead, I prefer to play the role of protector, and prevent these issues from ever arising.

Defending Against Tenant Disputes

For my landlord clients, this means ensuring that business processes are sound. Write lease terms that you plan to abide by. Be fair in penalizing property damage. Charge rent and any extras based on current market conditions.

However, it also means being extra careful that the lease terms are tight, and preparing for potential recourse, should the need arise. Landlord-tenant laws currently offer little in the way of a margin of error for landlords. Keeping current copies of the lease on file with your attorney allows us to strike the moment that a tenant is late on payments. Additionally, lease terms that favor your best interests gives us the tools to resolve disputes quickly, and with mutual satisfaction. For the sake of longevity, we also offer periodic reviews of our landlord clients’ rental operations to scan for weaknesses. With the proper diligence and deference to the risks as well as the right strategy, we can fix these weaknesses before it’s too late.

Keep Your Guard Up, and Operations Profitable

In a sense, being a landlord is just like being an ancient Roman emperor. Even when your real estate kingdom is operating as planned, you should never let your guard down. Remaining vigilant against potential threats will prevent tenants and others from taking advantage of hidden vulnerabilities.

At Clark’s Laws, we’ve helped many landlords and real estate investors take preventative measures against problems. Contact us to tighten your leases and find out how we can help protect your real estate business from vulnerabilities and potential issues.

  Filed under: Landlord & Tenant, Landlord Protection, Real Estate Investment, Real Estate Investment, Real Estate Law
  Comments: Comments Off on Beware the Ides of March


The Downside of Being a Landlord

By James Clark,

It’s 1am and your cell phone is ringing.  It’s one of your tenants.  A call at this hour, they’re not calling to say hi.  There’s a major problem.  What could it be?? You reach for the phone with a pit in your stomach.  Another day in the life of a landlord, right?

Being a landlord is a great way to go for a lot of reasons.  A proven way to build wealth, passive (most of the time) and tremendous tax benefits.  But what about the downside?  Those late night calls, the unexpected expenses, the vacancies, the nonpaying tenants?

A good client of mine, longtime landlord, calls these things “brain damage” and he’s right.  They suddenly consume your thinking, steal your focus and over time, wear on you.  No doubt.  The hits are coming, and they will keep on coming.  It’s a fact of landlord life, you can’t change it.

What you can change is how it affects you and how you’ll deal with it.  That 1am call is coming.  The question is  – How will you handle it?

Maybe YOU won’t take that call, rather you’ll run your properties more like a business and have a 24 hour answering service that can take the call and handle it.  If it’s a plumbing issue – they’ll get the plumber.  If they’re locked out – they’ll get the locksmith. All while you’re hopefully sleeping soundly.

Maybe you don’t want the expense of an answering service or “on-call” plumbers. If that’s the case then, you’ll need to adjust your attitude.  Instead of seeing it as a disruption, be grateful.  Back when I had a lot of residential rentals, I used to ride around with a plunger and a tool box in the back of my truck.  When I got those 1am calls, I ran to them with a smile.  In my mind, I wasn’t clearing clogged drains in the middle of the night, I was “keeping the money machine running”, and at the beginning of the next month when the rent checks all arrived, that was my proof that the machine was still working.  At that moment, I was the highest paid plunger operator in town!

It’s just mind over matter.  Your perspective.  Do you have to be crazy?  Maybe a little.  But the upside far outweighs the downside.  That’s just my humble opinion.

More importantly.  What do you think?  How will you handle it?  Are you ready to be a wealthy plunger operator?  If not, then maybe it would be best to find a different way.

 

Would you like to hear more about how we can help you become a better Landlord?  Give us a call at 631.669.6300 or email us at jclark@clarkslaws.com, and we’ll set up a time to discuss your issue further.

  Filed under: Business Crisis Management, Landlord & Tenant, Landlord Protection, Real Estate Investment, Real Estate Investment, Real Estate Law, Uncategorized
  Comments: Comments Off on The Downside of Being a Landlord